Don’t Just Complain, Do Something About It!
A hopelessly lost salesman came upon a farm house where the owner was rocking away on his porch. Late and desperate to get back on the road he stopped to ask for directions.
“Take the dirt road in the direction that the sun sets; keep going until you go past the old post office. Make a left after you drive past the broken down tractor that them Taylor boys left a sittin’ there,” explained the farmer. “Keep a goin’ a bit more until you pass the old sawmill, …” he continued but was interrupted by his old hound dog who let out a rather painful groan.
“Aroooogh,” moaned the dog.
The farmer continued, “…once you get past old McGreevy’s farm, make another left, and …”
“Arooooooogh”… once again, the dog lets out a painful moan.
“Excuse me,” asked the salesman, “but is there something wrong with your dog?”
The farmer looked down at the dog, paused a second, and then replied, “Naw, he’s just lying thar on a nail”. ”Wait a minute,” asked the puzzled salesperson, “if he is lying on a nail, why doesn’t he just get up?” Without missing a beat, the farmer said matter of factly, “Don’t hurt enough to get up, just to complain about it…”
Moral: How many times have you criticized someone for how they are doing something? How many problems have you solved with your friends over beers at the local pub? How often do you feel like you have a better idea? Well, stop complaining about it and do something about it!
Remember: ”It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.”
How Well Do Your Vendors Really Know You?
How well do our vendors know us? I mean, how well do they really know us? And how much do they care?
They collect countless data points about us through direct or indirect activity. They spend a lot of money buying lists containing all sorts of information about “people like us”, but what are they actually doing with all that information? Are they using it to create products geared towards our needs? Are they using it to make our shopping experience any better? Are they using it to make us feel special?
Are they even using it at all?
Based on one experience, It seems like some companies (some big name companies) just aren’t getting it.
Here’s my story…
You might consider me a coffee fanatic – the stronger and the hotter the better. I will wake up first thing in the morning and make a 12 cup pot of Cuban
coffee (one of my favorites) with the intention of drinking every last drop. But, as with the best laid schemes of mice and men, I typically throw some of that coffee away (I know, sacrilegious). So, when a few years back vendors started producing one cup coffee makers with the pods, I figured what the heck, it is still cheaper and easier than Starbucks. So I figured I would make the switch; but which one?
I researched, I asked friends, I tested, I priced, I researched some more and I ended up with a Tassimo brewer from Bosch (a division of Kraft Foods). This coffee maker was reasonably priced and it did so much more than the competition. Expresso, cappuccino, latte, hot chocolate, tea – I could make it all with this little gem. I just knew I had made the best choice and my coffee wasting days were behind me. I was so satisfied with the product that I became the Tassimo poster child. I registered my system on the Tassimo Web site and gave Bosch my personal information (something I rarely do). I told all my K-Cupping friends about my state of the art coffee making mecca. I celebrated the Tassimo robot commercials on TV. Heck, I became a one man Tassimo advertisement. You could consider me the epitome of a loyal Tassimo customer.
Unfortunately, over the past year or so I found that Tassimo coffees are getting harder and harder to find in retail outlets. Apparently Keurig made better agreements with coffee manufacturers like Starbucks than Kraft did and the availability of my dream coffee started waning. But I was not to be deterred, Tassimo had a Web site, right? So, I started ordering my coffee direct. This satisfied my need for awhile, at least until the choices became fewer and everything started being put on back order (especially my wife’s favorite, caramel macchiato). But I stuck with them – still believing in my choice of brewers.
I mention this because I have put more into my Tassimo relationship than Bosch has. So, when I received the following email from Bosch telling me that they appreciated my business and were inviting me to a “Customer Appreciation Event”, I felt that they finally started recognizing my investment.
Based on the email, I could save $10, $15 or $25 – depending on how much additional loyalty I was willing to demonstrate . Apparently ”loyalty” is measured by the number of dollars I am willing to spend now, not what I have already spent in the past. Nor is it measured by the fact that I have continued to stick with them even though half the time the items I want are on back order or that I continue to shop with them even though their merchandise has mysteriously disappeared from retail shelves. I didn’t respond right away, but the email did make me feel somewhat “special”.
Three days later I received an email with the subject of:
LAST DAY to Shop and Save $10, $15 or $25
Apparently Bosch appreciated me, but only during the three days of the sales event, itself. Is that appreciation? Hardly.
But, being the price conscious person that I am, I bit. I went to the web site and put in my order for over $100 dollars of merchandise to get the maximum discount (of which $75 worth of product was back ordered). Sigh….
Did Bosch consult their records of my buying history to help me make my purchase? Did they steer me towards those products that I have faithfully purchased in the past? Did they give me a whole-hearted apology for my products being on back order (for the umpteenth-millionth time)? Did they in any way make me feel “appreciated” in this transaction? Hardly. In fact, the whole experience has had the opposite effect. Instead of feeling appreciated, I feel like I was being used to help Bosch reach a sales quota.
Unfortunately, the sales process has become a contentious relationship between the customer and the vendor. Customers are wary of being taken advantage of by vendors who are only out to sell (caveat emptor, right?). They feel that vendors are only out to take advantage of them, so they will do whatever they can to take advantage of the situation first. Unfortunately vendors who actually do care about their customers are all too often lumped into the same category as predatory ones (have you been to a used car lot lately).
The trust between the customer and the vendor is all but gone.
The fact of the matter is that it doesn’t have to be that way. Customers can be fiercely loyal to brands (just ask Apple, Levis, or Budweiser) and all that it takes is for the vendor to show an ounce of loyalty back. It doesn’t take much, just enough to make customers feel like they are valued. Just enough to make them feel like they have a say in the sales conversation, just enough to make them feel like they are truly ‘special’.
Is that too much to ask for?
A word of advice to vendors, ‘they don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care’.
How much do you really care about us?
Facebook’s Initial Public Offering Disaster
Facebook’s IPO was a relative disaster.
While it brought billions into Facebook’s coffers, one could hardly call the first day of trading a success. They opened at $38/share and ended up the day at $38.27 (a gain of less than 1%).
The only reason why their stock didn’t dip below the opening price was because they were being propped up by bankers who poured in millions every time the stock threatened to go below $38/share. In fact, the stock price was a flat $38/share a mere 30 seconds before the closing bell before the bankers once again jumped in to help save “Face”. (See “How Facebook’s Bankers Saved an IPO, Kept Shares Above $38” for more information.)
They say that people vote with their pocket books. Based on first day of trading, Facebook is ready to be voted out of office. Is this indicative of social media sites, in general or are people getting tired of Facebook?
My daughter said something quite profound when I told her about what happened. She said, “Dad, it’s just a web site. People get tired of it and they go elsewhere.” Wow, so Facebook may be subject to the same fate suffered by mega-giant portals like AOL, Yahoo, and Netscape? Maybe that’s why sites like Pinterest are trending upwards while Facebook is trending down.
Is it possible that people are getting tired of Facebook not adding anything more to their life than just a time-suck?
The Most Complete History of Directory Services You Will Ever Find
Directory Services Timeline
The Most Complete History of Directory Services You Will Ever Find
(Until the next one comes along)
| Date | Event |
Source |
| 1969 | First Arpanet node comes online; first RFC published. | |
| 1973 | Ethernet invented by Xerox PARC researchers. | |
| 1982 | TCP/IP replaces older Arpanet protocols on the Internet. | |
| 1982 | First distributed computing research paper on Grapevine published by Xerox PARC researchers. | |
| 1984 | Internet DNS comes online. | |
| 1986 | IETF formally chartered. | |
| 1989 | Quipu (X.500 software package) released. | |
| 1990 | Estimated number of Internet hosts exceeds 250,000. | |
| 1990 | First version of the X.500 standard published. | |
| 1991 | A team at CERN headed by Tim Berners-Lee releases the first World Wide Web software. | |
| 1992 | University of Michigan developers release the first LDAP software. | |
| 1993 | NDS debuts in Netware 4.0. | |
| July 1993 | LDAP specification first published as RFC 1487. | |
| December 1995 | First standalone LDAP server (SLAPD) ships as part of U-M LDAP 3.2 release. | |
| April 1996 | Consortium of more than 40 leading software vendors endorses LDAP as the Internet directory service protocol of choice. | |
| 1996 | Netscape Hires Tim Howes, Mark Smith, and Gordon Good from University of Michigan. Howes serves as a directory server architect. | |
| September 1997 | Sun Microsystems releases Sun Directory Services 1.0, derived from U-M LDAP 3.2 |
3 |
| November 1997 | LDAPv3 named the winner of the PC Magazine Award for Technical Excellence. | |
| December 1997 | LDAPv3 approved as a proposed Internet Standard. | |
| 1998 | The OpenLDAP Project was started by Kurt Zeilenga. The project started by cloning the LDAP reference source from the University Of Michigan. | |
| January 1998 | Netscape ships the first commercial LDAPv3 directory server. | |
| March 1998 | Innosoft acquires Mark Walh’s Critical Angle company, relesases LDAP directory server product 4.1 one month later. | |
| July 1998 | Sun Microsystems ships Sun Directory Server 3.1, implementing LDAPv3 standards |
3 |
| July 1998 | Estimated number of Internet hosts exceeds 36 million. | |
| 1999 | AOL acquires Netscape and forms the iPlanet Alliance with Sun Microsystems. | |
| March 1999 | Innosoft team, led by Mark Wahl, releases Innosoft Distributed Directory Server 5.0 |
3 |
| March 2000 | Sun Microsystems acquires Innosoft, merges Innosoft directory code with iPlanet. This forms the foundation for the iPlanet Directory Access Router. |
3 |
| October 2001 | The iPlanet Alliance ends and Sun and Netscape fork the codebase. | |
| October 2004 | Apache Directory Server Top Level Project is formed after 1 year in incubation |
3 |
| December 2004 | RedHat Purchases Netscape Server products | |
| 2005 | Sun Microsystems initiates the OpenDS project. An open source directory server based on the Java platform. | |
| June 2005 | RedHat Releases Fedora Directory Server | |
| October 2006 | Apache Directory Server 1.0 is released |
3 |
| 2007 | UnboundID releases its directory server |
12 |
| 2008 | AOL Stops Supporting Netscape Products | |
| April 2009 | Oracle purchases Sun Microsystems | |
| May 2009 | RedHat changes the Fedora Directory Server to 389 Directory Server | |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ForgeRock is founded |
3 |
| Dec 2010 | ForgeRock releases OpenDJ | |
| July 2011 | Oracle releases Oracle Unified Directory |
Sources:
(1) Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services; Second Edition; Timothy A. Howes, Ph.D., Mark C. Smith, and Gordon S. Good.
(2) 389 Directory Server; History (http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/History).
(3) Email exchange with Ludovic Poitou (ForgeRock).
(4) Press Release, March 16th, 1998; “Innosoft Acquires LDAP Technology Leader Critical Angle Inc. (http://www.pmdf.process.com/press/critical-angle-acquire.html).
(5) OpenLDAP; Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenLDAP).
(6) iPlanet; Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPlanet).
(7) OpenDS; Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDS).
(8) Netscape; Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape).
(9) Press Release, April 20th, 2000; “Oracle Buys Sun” (http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/018363).
(10) 389 Directory Server; 389 Change FAQ (http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/389_Change_FAQ).
(11) OpenDJ; Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDJ).
(12) Email exchange with Nick Crown (UnboundID).
(13) Press Release, July 20th, 2011; “Oracle Announces Oracle Unified Directory 11g” (http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/434211).
Trust in Me
Trust in me, I’m the social media vendor providing this FREE service because I want to make you happy. I know that all of this infrastructure and the thousands of employees I have working for me are costing a small fortune, but I do this because I care …. I care about YOU!
Trust in me, I’m the software development company who develops these FREE applications because we are looking out for you. We know that you need something entertaining to do or something informative to occupy your time. We ask you questions about your preferences so that we can customize the software for YOU. That’s the only reason, trust us.
Trust in me, I’m a one man developer operating out of my house creating these FREE applications so that you don’t have to pay for the premium ones. I have no visions of grandeur for myself. I have no dreams of making money for myself, I am doing this for you!
REALLY? No catches at all? Awesome, where do I sign up?
I learned a long time ago that there is no such thing as a free lunch, yet people continue to be duped into believing lies to the contrary. Let me be clear,
Privacy is an illusion in our current social media landscape. Period.
If you think that these FREE services are free then think again; they are anything but. In fact, social media companies and application developers are making money off of the very things that are most precious to you – they are making money by selling information about you and your loved ones. Whether they are selling this information directly or indirectly through advertising, these entities are collecting thousands of pages of information about you – enough to fill volumes of books. Don’t believe me, read Kim Cameron’s article, 24 Year Old Student Lights Match: Europe Versus Facebook.
Your preferences, your habits, your activity – essentially your life – is meticulously tracked by social media sites and used to predict your behavior. With this information in hand, they seek out those who are looking to target those with this behavior or are willing to pay to gain access to these people. It is a well-known fact that social media sites may know more about you than your own family members do, but social media is not the only culprit. “Real world” businesses have been tracking your behavior for years and are just as savvy as social media sites (see How Target Figured Out A Teen Girl Was Pregnant Before Her Father Did). The amount and types of data associated with social media sites is much greater than that obtained in brick and mortar stores as it is more plentiful, easier to gather, easier to store, and easier to analyze.
In George Orwell’s book, 1984, we were worried about a Big Brother that we feel never came. In reality, however, he came and brought his whole family with him and they are all watching us. Get used to it, or take the steps necessary to protect your information assets the same way you protect the money in your bank or your legal documents.
Last month, I wrote a blog entry entitled Which Line Do You Want To Be In? in which I stated that people are
willing to trade important things in life for short term gain
Unfortunately when convenience and privacy are at odds with each other, people tend to throw privacy out the window in trade for convenience. Are these people oblivious or do they simply feel that they have no choice. Have they made a conscious decision or are they simply uneducated to the risks associated with privacy breaches? I tend to believe that most people are too trusting and do not know (or simply do not understand) what information is collected about them and what happens when their information is inadvertently shared. You can classify these people based on age and/or knowledge of technology as follows:
- Typical Kids – who do not yet understand privacy implications
- Typical Adults – who may understand privacy, but don’t understand technology and how it can affect their privacy
- Tech-Savvy Adults – who understand privacy AND take an active role in protecting themselves on social media sites
For those of you who fall in the third category, I know that I am preaching to the choir here, but unfortunately the vast majority of people do not attend the church where this message is being preached. There are still many people who have never heard the message or if they have, they simply choose to ignore it. Is it because they disagree that information is being tracked? Or is it maybe that privacy policies on most social media web sites are simply too difficult to read and/or understand and it is simply easier just to “click through” to get to the site that we want.
I once heard that marketing agencies build their message so that a person with a 7th Grade education can understand it. That is an unfortunate statement to the intelligence of the average American. Unfortunately, it is also a statement that many companies rely on when crafting their legal documents.
Suffice to say, if the price is FREE, it may be costing you dearly.
It Happened One Night
I used to be on the road quite a bit teaching classes or consulting with customers. While the cities were many and the customers diverse, the one thing that was always the same was my music collection – it went with me wherever I went (and continues to do so today).
I was in California on one such event doing work for Sun Microsystems. While listening to my Eagles playlist one particular morning, I was inspired to write this little diddy. The words just flowed and I finished before the first student arrived. I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I did writing it.
(Words are mine, songs are from one of the greatest bands of all time – The Eagles.)
So, I left the customer site last night and headed back to my hotel. You know, my HOTEL CALIFORNIA. It was late in the evening (as usual) and as luck would have it, I came face to face with an OUTLAW MAN in Sun’s parking lot (damn security). He asked me to hand over all my money, but as luck would have it, I had already been robbed that day – by my wife – the WITCHY WOMAN.
I told him to TAKE IT EASY as I reached for the few coins that I had in my pocket. He asked me IS IT TRUE that this is all I had? I responded, yes, there are TOO MANY HANDS in my pocket and he would just have to GET OVER IT. Thank goodness that he felt sorry for me (being the NEW KID IN TOWN and all) and felt that any further effort would simply be WASTED TIME.
When I finally reached the hotel, I found two PRETTY MAIDS ALL IN A ROW (my wife and daughter) and one lone DESPERADO – (my son) who was in trouble because of his LYIN’ EYES (I am glad that he is only three, otherwise he would have landed in a TEENAGE JAIL). My wife relayed her story to me and I to her. Her story paled in comparison to mine and she questioned, IS IT TRUE? (You see, she had caught me in the past CHUGing ALL NIGHT with the GIRL FROM YESTERDAY and she doubted my story)? To which I responded, I CAN’T TELL YOU WHY – IN THE CITY – there’s a HEARTACHE TONIGHT, but that’s what you get when you live LIFE IN THE FASTLANE.
As I look back over the whole event, and look at all the things on this earth that are OUT OF CONTROL, I had to laugh. Because in THE LONG RUN, LIFE’S BEEN GOOD, and even when you TAKE IT TO THE LIMIT, it is still just a GOOD DAY IN HELL so you might as well get that PEACEFUL EASY FEELING and LEARN TO BE STILL.
(Links added for your listening pleasure; not all songs available on MP3.)
Book Review: The Catcher in the Rye
![]() |
The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger
Bill has read this book
|
||
| Comment:I never read the Catcher in the Rye when I was young, maybe it was better that way. But over the years I had heard about this book mainly due to its association with Mark David Chapman (John Lennon‘s assassin) and John Hinkley (Ronald Reagon‘s would be assassin); suffice to say my interest was peaked. I wanted to see what in the book could have been found so fascinating by mentally unstable people such as these or as conspiracy theorists suggest what was the “trigger” in the book that caused these men’s actions to be set in motion. So, in my adult life, I read J.D. Salinger’s book – The Catcher in the Rye really knowing nothing more than I have already stated.
The story is told from the point of view of its protagonist, Holden Caulfield, as he lies in his bed at a west-coast mental institution. It appears that Holden is getting out soon and this may be his way of “cleansing” before he leaves. Holden shares his exact thoughts with the reader as he addresses them directly in more of a stream of consciousness than of a simple explanation. The reader shares intimate details of his emotional state of mind, his opinions, and all the twists and turns that one’s mind can take – mostly dark ones. At first it was difficult reading in this manner, but I eventually got used to it. In fact, I found myself sympathizing with Holden – even though he may appear to be the poster child for attention deficit disorder (ADD). His character is one of innocence, unbridled honesty, and a total lack of tolerance for those he considers “phony” – traits that we may all relate to in some way or another. He relates to children better than adults and in fact considers himself a protector of children – something that gives insight to the book’s title. The third son of a wealthy Manhattan family, the telling details the events that took place leading up to the previous Christmas break when Holden was expelled from Pencey Prep School. The year is 1949 and he leaves the school early after getting into a fight with his roommate. Unable to face his parents before his expected return, he spends the next two days in New York experiencing perverted behavior, drunken stupors, and a near encounter with a prostitute. You never really know how old Holden is, but some believe he is anywhere between the age of 15 and 17. His adult language, his mannerisms and the situations he gets into make him seem much older, however. Holden eventually makes his way home to his beloved little sister, Phoebe, who appears to be the only one who can understand him. He decides to run away, but is swayed otherwise when Phoebe decides to join him. He disagrees and after getting into a fight with Phoebe, he decides to stay as he watches her ride the carousel in Central Park Zoo. For the first time in the story, he is filled with happiness at the sight of Phoebe riding the carousel. Did I find what I was looking for in this book? Do I now have some sort of insight into the minds of people who are considered sick? Did I find the key phrase that triggers assassins to kill? No. But the honesty that J.D. Salinger shares with his readers as told through Holden Caulfield is mind opening to say the least. The Catcher in the Rye is definitely different and it is that difference that has made is both one of the most celebrated books of our time – as well as one of the most censored books. I can say that I have never read a book quite like this but I am glad that I experienced it. The key word in that last sentance is “experience” as this book is definitely an experience. |
|||










